First Letter from Tim Ferguson to Kamala Harris, November 2024

Abstract: On or about the Ides of every month except March, the Adams Institute will send two letters to prominent Americans whose words or actions are relevant to the proposed amendment, and whose contributions to the idea of democratic-republican government merit all of our attention. These letters will also carbon-copy other distinguished individuals who were somehow involved in the recipient’s words or deeds, or in our analysis thereof. 

Our initial letters, along with correspondence explaining to copied individuals why they were copied, will be published as an open diary of correspondence in the hopes of inspiring discussion of our proposed amendment and emulation of the recipients’ good examples. PDF files featuring scans of all this original correspondence will be available for download, and the substantive content of each primary letter will be pasted in blog-post format.

November 13, 2024

Madam Vice President:

Over the past 50 years, America’s middle class has been pummeled at the hands of both Republicans and Democrats.[i] In the 2024 presidential election, you campaigned on the correct issue inasmuch as you campaigned on its behalf. Indeed, you made middle-class hope the centerpiece of your campaign, just as your opponent made middle-class anger the centerpiece of his. Unfortunately for your campaign, it seems that the American people today harbor more anger than hope.

The essence of America is that it is to be a republic. In order to have a commonwealth, the commons must have the wealth. On this point, the intuition of ordinary Americans agrees with the reason of political philosophers and the principles of our Founding Fathers: the middle class should own at least half the wealth.[ii] This belief has held steady for 24 centuries. It is not communism. It is not socialism. It is Classical republicanism. That the middle class should come first is American patriotism 101. 

Whereas middle-class primacy leads to stability and prosperity, middling insecurity causes pessimism, polarization, demagoguery, patronage, authoritarianism, and cultism.[iii] The fate of our middle class over the next few decades will decide the fate of our American experiment in the democratic-republican model of government. Next to the gravity of these considerations, the other issues influencing this election’s outcome are insignificant. Yet, fed by the underlying anger of the American people, their prominence far outgrew their significance, crowding out any genuine, sober discourse on how we might restore middle-class primacy. 

We write you now to introduce a plan – entitled Operation Abigail – that would do just that. We ask that you take a few moments to review the enclosed summary of Operation Abigail, and if you agree with it, to endorse it.

That summary broadly outlines a plan to rebuild America’s middle class appealing to all good-natured Americans, whatever their heritage or political affiliation. Its vision is to restore the middle-class primacy of the 1950s, without the segregation, the racism, and the sexism. And if it still remains true to its egalitarian origins, the Republican Party – the party of Abraham Lincoln, Thaddeus Stevens, Theodore Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower – will rush to the front lines to support Operation Abigail.[iv] For no plan has ever enunciated a more authentically conservative and republican vision than of the triumphant middle-class commonwealth, inherited from the Founding Fathers, improved for our posterity.

But that summary does not fully elaborate one feature of Operation Abigail: Its power to mitigate pre-Revolution Black wealth disparities. To aid in considering your willingness to support our efforts, I devote the rest of this letter to that aspect of our plan.

Any plan that would restore what was best about America’s founding is incomplete unless it also undertakes to repair what was worst. For all our veneration of the Founding Fathers, whose opposition to monarchy and devotion to the republican cause can never be tarnished, we must also remember that at the birth of this republic, about one person in five was enslaved. These slaves can account themselves among the founding generation as any minutemen who picked up the rifle to win our freedom from the foreign power which then ruled our affairs. In fact, many of them did.

Yet hard economic reality demonstrates in mathematical terms that, while their descendants have a first-class claim to America’s founding heritage, too many of them have only enjoyed a second-class share of its blessings. 160 years after Abolition, the Black median household net worth is barely one-tenth the White median.[v] Modern research shows that, at current rates, White-Black income convergence won’t be achieved for another 180 years, sometime around the year 2,200.[vi] The more we learn, the less surprised we should be. 160 years may seem like a long time ago to Americans, but ultra-long term datasets of intergenerational wealth and income elasticity in Italy demonstrate the persistence of economic advantages existing as far back as the Renaissance, passed from wealthy families to their descendants across the span of 600 years![vii] The United States isn’t even 250 years old yet.

If economic disparities which existed before Leonardo and Michelangelo were even born can still be detected in homogeneous Florence, Italy after 600 years, of course slavery’s economic consequences will still persist in multiracial Florence, South Carolina after 160. The freedmen started with almost nothing but the enmity of the majority and from there endured over a century of segregation and discrimination. Despite the often-quoted and moronic refrain that enough time has by now passed to erase those inequalities – which seeks to hold Black Americans responsible for Black wealth disparities – the truth is that the project of economic convergence moves much slower than nominal political or legal equality. And this is especially so against the historic headwinds of segregation and discrimination.

Operation Abigail would create an immediate and powerful market incentive to ameliorate these historic racial economic disparities, thereby hastening the convergence. And it would do so in a manner that would take nothing away from White Americans.  

As the enclosed outline describes, Operation Abigial would prospectively tether the top households to the national median household net worth at an efficient mathematical ratio such that the outcomes of America’s top households thereafter rise and fall lockstep in proportion to the national median. The top households must thereafter cause the median to increase in order to themselves enjoy any future gains. If this sounds like an incentive plan, that’s precisely what it is: Operation Abigail simply scales up capitalism’s own invention of the long-term incentive plan from the level of enterprise to nation.

The initial ratio would be 10,000:1. This would set a $1.5 billion cap, a limit surpassed by about 675 American households. The multiple could be periodically adjusted as necessary to cover the requisite number of households having adequate market power to endow the incentive plan with incentive force. But even under the initial 10,000x threshold, the potential is clear: at 10,000:1, every $1 increase to the median rewards the top by $10,000; every $10,000, by $100 million; and every $100,000, by $1 billion.

Applying this general framework to America’s current racial disparities, the incentive to eliminate or at least substantially mitigate them also becomes clear, particularly since Black wealth disparities are so severe. By our math, Black wealth disparities alone drag down the national median by perhaps $40,000, which by operation of the 10,000:1 ratio would create a $400 million per-covered household incentive to reduce them.[viii] One beauty of median benchmarking is that this could not be effectively achieved simply by shifting wealth or income from White to Black households because that wouldn’t raise the median. Operation Abigail ensures that elites are rewarded only for increasing America’s total wealth.

Put simply: Operation Abigail makes tolerating extreme racial disparities very, very expensive for succeeding generations of elites.

And, just like a true incentive plan, Operation Abigail leaves the manner and method that are actually used to raise the median to market actors.[ix] Though we could make a few suggestions, it’s beyond our remit to dictate any specific policy other than to create the incentive itself, for doing so would change the ratio’s character from that of an incentive plan to a mandate. That said, and without any consultation with or suggestion by them, we would recommend serious consideration of Darrick Hamilton’s and Sandy Darrity’s Baby Bonds program as one positive-sum technique that could be used to accelerate racial wealth convergence.

In any event, put any median-top social aspect ratio in place, and witness the project of reducing Black wealth disparities rise from the status of “maybe someday” to urgent market imperative. Discover the optimal ratio, and watch as all other ordinary workers are lifted too, side-by-side, in a great racial economic convergence into the strongest middle class foundation of the greatest republic in history.

Sincerely,

Tim Ferguson

A copy of Operation Abigail was enclosed behind this letter in the physical mailing to this recipient. Here is a link to the current version of Operation Abigail, which may have superseded the version that was submitted with this letter. Refer to the PDF scan of this letter for the version which was sent to this recipient.

[i] See Carter C. Price and Kathryn A. Edwards, Trends in Income From 1975 to 2018. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2020, calculating the gains that would have but did not accrue to ordinary Americans since 1975 relative to post-World War II run rates. The abstract: “From 1975 to 2018, the difference between the aggregate taxable income for those below the 90th percentile and the equitable growth counterfactual totals $47 trillion.”

[ii] The common intuition of mankind is that the middle class should own at least half; therefore, this is the target for which legislation should backsolve. See Aristotle, Pol., 1295b, and James Harrington, Id. That the intuition of ordinary Americans agrees, see Michael I. Norton and Dan Ariely, Building a Better America – One Wealth Quintile at a Time, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Association for Psychological Science, 2011. Federal Reserve data shows that achieving this target requires the movement of around $30-$35 trillion worth of wealth into the middle class when defined as the middle three quintiles by income percentage or the middle 40% (between the top 10% and bottom 50%). John Adams adhered to Harrington principles; see a letter from John Adams to James Sullivan, 26 May 1776: “Harrington has Shewn that Power always follows Property. This I believe to be as infallible a Maxim, in Politicks, as, that Action and Re-action are equal, is in Mechanicks.” That the Founders would have advocated positive interventions, including wealth caps, as necessary to preserve the United States as a middle-class democratic republic, see, e.g., John Adams to Abigail Adams, 25 August 1776, on Tiberius Gracchus reviving “the old Project of an equal Division of the conquered Lands, (a genuine republican Measure, tho it had been too long neglected to be then practicable).” The Lex Sempronia Agraria revised the Lex Licinia-Sextia, imposing hard caps on private use of public lands. Adams was influenced by James Harrington, whose agrarian proposal would have balanced the nobility 50/50 with the commoners, capping landholdings at £2,000 annual revenues. This is why Adams advised James Sullivan that he wanted “to make the Acquisition of Land easy to every Member of Society: to make a Division of the Land into Small Quantities, So that the Multitude may be possessed of landed Estates.” See also Noah Webster’s favorable account of Gracchus, Miscellaneous Remarks on Divizions of Property … in the United States, 1790: “Rome, with the name of a republic, was several ages losing the spirit and principle. The Gracchi endeavored to check the growing evil by an agrarian law; but were not successful.” Thomas Jefferson’s actions are also particularly instructive on the Founder’s pro-middle class interventionist mentality. See the first three drafts of Thomas Jefferson’s 1776 Virginia constitution, reviewed by James Madison, establishing a conditional 50-acre viritim (land grant) to every eligible adult male citizen. Read this measure especially in conjunction with his 1776 law to abolish entails and 1785 law to abolish primogeniture in Virginia, by which, he announced to John Adams, he “laid the axe to the root of Pseudoaristocracy.” Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 28 October 1813. Other states also abolished entails and primogeniture in an effort to avert wealth concentration.

[iii] See James Madison, Federalist No. 10: “The most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property.” That middle classes promote political stability, see, e.g., Euripides, Suppliants, Line 238 et seq., Plato, Laws 679b, Aristotle, Pol., 1291b, 1295b That extreme wealth concentration destroyed the Roman Republic, history’s only other example of a superpower popular republic, see Appian, The Civil Wars, I.1, Sallust, Conspiracy of Catiline, 10, 33. I; 37.3, 38, 53, The Jugurthine War, 4, Livy, History of Rome, Preface, Tacitus, Annals, 3.27, Florus, Epitome, I, XLVII, Lucan, Pharsalia, 1.63. Marcus Philippus said in 104BC that out of perhaps 400,000 citizens, only around 2,000 held any significant wealth.

[iv] From the standpoint of the economic interests of the American working man, Steve Bannon has lately sounded like a Thaddeus Stevens type. See The New York Times July 1, 2024 op-ed My Unsettling Interview with Steve Bannon, in which he said, among other things: “We’re fighting for a republic,” and “You’ve got to not just reallocate income, you have to reallocate assets. People have to have a stake in this,” and “now, the American citizen has all the obligations of serving in the military, of paying taxes, of going through this grind that is American late-stage technofeudal capitalism,” and “Look at John Fetterman. Fetterman and Steve Bannon are closer in their economics than Steve Bannon and the Republican establishment,” and “We have a capitalist economy that has no capitalists, right? It has hypercapitalists or state capitalism You’ve got to not just reallocate income, you have to reallocate assets. People have to have a stake in this. That’s all they’re asking for.

[v] Based on the average of 2019-2022 data, the national median household net worth is approximately $150,000, the White household median is approximately $231,000, and the Black household median is approximately $26,000.

[vi] See Guglielmo Barone and Sauro Mocetti, Intergenerational Mobility in the Very Long Run: Florence 1427-2011, Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1060, 28 April 2016. The abstract states in part: “We examine intergenerational mobility in the very long run, across generations that are six centuries apart. We exploit a unique dataset containing detailed information at the individual level for all people living in the Italian city of Florence in 1427. These individuals have been associated, using their surnames, with their pseudo-descendants living in Florence in 2011. We find that earnings elasticity is about 0.04, much higher than predicted by traditional models of intergenerational mobility. We also find an even stronger role for real wealth inheritance and evidence of persistence in belonging to certain elite professions.”

[vii] See simulations by Ellora Derenoncourt et al., which implies that “even by the year 2200, by which time the racial income gap would have closed in our model, we would still have a positive wealth gap of 1.4,” from Wealth of Two Nations: The U.S. Racial Wealth Gap, 1860-2020, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 30101, 2022.

[viii] Our calculations are preliminary and subject to confirmation, but even if our calculations are off by a hundred million or two per covered household, the per-covered-household racial disparity overhang will still be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

[ix] Under the Baby Bonds program, every child is provided with a publicly-funded appreciating trust account at birth, the proceeds of which are to be used for efficient, wealth-generating purposes. States could efficiently use a portion of their revenue shares raised via ratio enforcement to seed these accounts.

Property monopolized, or in the Possession of a Few is a Curse to Mankind. We should preserve not an Absolute Equality – this is unnecessary, but preserve all from extreme Poverty, and all others from extravagant Riches.