About
The most perfect community must be among those who are in the middle rank.
The word res, every one knows, signified in the Roman language wealth, riches, property; the word publicus, quasi populicus, and per syncope pôplicus, signified public, common, belonging to the people; res publica, therefore, was publica res, the wealth, riches, or property of the people. Res populi, and the original meaning of the word republic could be no other than a government in which the property of the people predominated and governed; and it had more relation to property than liberty.
From A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America, by John Adams, Volume III, Letter III (Padoua) (1788), citing Aristotle, Politics, 1295b in the first part.
All we think about, care about, and talk about is related to the principle of middle-class primacy, because we’ll never keep our republic without an upright and independent middle class. To us, this means preserving as many households in the middle class who are already there, while raising as many households from below into the middle class as possible. This struggle must continue…
Until the middle owns half.
The lessons of Classical Antiquity teach that the middling share of national prosperity is no less important to life, liberty, and happiness than any Enlightenment precept bestowed upon us by our Founding Fathers. The predominance of an upright and independent middle class is therefore as essential to our democratic-republican form of government as the liberties and guarantees embodied within our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.
This truth requires an appropriate prioritization and balancing of the competing rights and interests of civil society. While property rights are sacrosanct, they are not absolute. No sensible or sustainable understanding of the right to accumulate property can tolerate any encroachment into the middling share so far that pessimism annihilates optimism and the middling virtues dissolve, transforming a free and democratic people into the bewildered and squabbling playthings of demagogues. All private fortunes are subordinate to the democratic-republican form and substance of political society. All claims to the contrary are invalid and rightly dismissed. All practices encroaching into the middling share jeopardize our experiment in self-government and are justly curtailed.
Any appropriate limitation imposed upon the rights of accumulation must, however, comport with the values of common sense and due process. This requires that such limits be applied to households rather than enterprises, because the tantrums of individuals are easily confined and households are the final owners of almost all wealth and thus the repositories of greatest market incentive and the fulcrums of greatest enforcement leverage. They must be conveyed through market actors, in order to induce productive and earned wealth deconcentration and avoid the waste, dependency, and patronage that accompanies government-administered wealth redistribution. They must be calculated based on net worth, rather than income or purchasing power, so that they factor the cumulative effects of all economic activity depressing our middle class households. They must be tethered in mathematical proportion the national median, enabling and encouraging the top to raise their limits by raising the median; otherwise policy can bear nothing but an accidental relationship to the middle class. They must be high enough to preserve incentives for legitimate and productive innovation and entrepreneurship, fueling the dreams of avarice for which most ambition strives. They must be uniform nationwide, so that they cannot be arbitraged by States and elites. They must be implemented via constitutional provision, to withstand apportionment clause attacks and the vicissitudes of ordinary politics. And they must periodically adjusted within a prescribed range according to objective and rational criteria and evolving macroeconomic conditions until the optimal social aspect ratio is discovered.
America’s founding generation gave us a brilliant though imperfect political constitution which ordained the legal form of a democratic republic. It has fallen to our generation to restore and expand its political substance: An upright and independent middle class, continually refreshed by upward mobility.
Our vision is to forever redeem what was best about America’s founding, and finally repair what was worst. Our mission is to advance the legal means by which this would be achieved: Through our proposed constitutional amendment.
Wheel, Brake, Curriculum, Amendment.
These four words encompass the entire raison d’etre of the Adams Institute for the Preservation of the Democratic Republican Model of Government. They describe the problems we were established to solve and the solutions which we seek to advance.
A brief abstract of each, in sequence:
The Wheel: the idea that every unchecked regime is corrupted, and every corrupted regime is replaced, a process which ultimately resolves into a cycle for wealthy states whose destiny is not controlled by another. The most complete description gives the natural and probable series as chiefdom, kingship, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and mob-rule, finally back to chiefdom, and its late stages are evident in America today.
The Brake: the idea that because no unchecked power remains uncorrupted, the optimal constitution checks and balances the best features of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. This approach has been variously adopted or perceived in the constitutions of Sparta, Rome, Carthage, Britain, and the checks and balances embodied by the separation of legislative, executive, and judicial powers in the constitutions of Massachusetts and the United States.
The Curriculum: the collective historical lessons which show that the engine rotating the Wheel is the diffusion and re-concentration of wealth. The key takeaways are that popular government depends upon the preeminence of an upright and independent middle class, that America was born a democratic republic because it was born middle class, and that any measure that would enable the continuation of authentic democratic government must solve not only for household insecurity but also household dependency.
The Amendment: a policy measure, informed by the lessons of history, to expand the Constitution’s mandate from establishing the legal form of a democratic republic to preserving its political substance. The method proposed is to impose nationwide median-top household wealth tethering at an appropriate ratio, tethering elite outcomes lockstep in mathematical proportion to middling outcomes, requiring legislators to introduce market incentives to induce market actors to backsolve for a national middle class of any prescribed target size.
And that’s it. Everything we think, write, speak, or do will be somehow related to the ideas embodied within the four words of Wheel, Brake, Curriculum, and Amendment. For all these words
Property monopolized, or in the Possession of a Few is a Curse to Mankind. We should preserve not an Absolute Equality – this is unnecessary, but preserve all from extreme Poverty, and all others from extravagant Riches.
John Adams, 1765
Property monopolized, or in the Possession of a Few is a Curse to Mankind. We should preserve not an Absolute Equality – this is unnecessary, but preserve all from extreme Poverty, and all others from extravagant Riches.
John Adams, 1765
© 2024 John Adams Institute. All rights reserved. The John Adams Institute, operating as the Adams Institute for the Preservation of the Democratic-Republican Model of Government, is not a government organization or affiliated with any government organization. We do not endorse or oppose any specific candidates for public office. This website is not a government website. No statement or suggestion of government endorsement is intended or should be inferred. No endorsement of any of our ideas or activities by any person referenced on this website is intended or should be inferred unless otherwise explicitly stated. The John Adams Institute is a nonprofit corporation, is not a tax-exempt organization, and does not engage in commercial activities. No communication on this website is intended as a lobbying communication or as a solicitation for financial support but is only intended to stimulate intelligent public discourse. For full legal terms and disclaimers, visit our Legal page.
© 2024 John Adams Institute. All rights reserved. The John Adams Institute, operating as the Adams Institute for the Preservation of the Democratic-Republican Model of Government, is not a government organization or affiliated with any government organization. We do not endorse or oppose any specific candidates for public office. This website is not a government website. No statement or suggestion of government endorsement is intended or should be inferred. No endorsement of any of our ideas or activities by any person referenced on this website is intended or should be inferred unless otherwise explicitly stated. The John Adams Institute is a nonprofit corporation, is not a tax-exempt organization, and does not engage in commercial activities. No communication on this website is intended as a lobbying communication or as a solicitation for financial support but is only intended to stimulate intelligent public discourse. For full legal terms and disclaimers, visit our Legal page.